Logo - White "Y" cut into red background

WWW http://yayacanada.com
Commentary Blogging from Ottawa, Canada
Saying NO to corporate rule, war, occupation, racism, secret trials, gov't/media lies

READER COMMENTS
Have your say!

Archives
HOME PAGE
Friday May 09, 2008

Is that a mole on your arm, Mr. Bernier?

PM Harper says that the company a politican keeps, on a salary paid by the taxpayer, is nobody's business.  Meanwhile his government continues to hand over the taxpayers' private lives to corporations and microchips, and even tries to control our thoughts and speech.

For example: do you want to have a choice over how to stay healthy?  Then you'd better holler about Bill C-51 because the government is on the warpath against healthfood stores and home remedies again.  I don't buy products from health food stores myself - I keep my life even simpler than that - but Bill C-51 is part of the whole move to have every aspect of our lives controlled by a few corporations - in this case big pharm.  Here's more info.

Right now I have a burning trachea and a disgusting cough that will be nicely soothed with no-name honey and no-name apple cider vinegar in hot liquid, while I rest and allow my body to heal itself.  But it's hard to know what to do about a mole.  Most are benign, but some are not, so says the medical wisdom that makes mistakes all the time (CBC) - but hasn't "wished any harm".

I've probably said this before: if I ever went to a doctor and was diagnosed with cancer, I would need at least 85 second opinions.

Now, as to Maxime Bernier's mole(Star), as I've been saying for quite some time about the Reformists who call themselves Conservatives, you can dress them up, but ...

For starters, it's too bad Mr. Bernier's lady friend has been so influenced by attention-seeking Hollywood celebrities that she thinks dressing up means baring as much of her bazooms as possible.  But one has to wonder why the Liberals waited all this time, after Bernier says they've broken up, to create the fuss.  More on this here (Cancom).

Still, Harper is wrong to say that it's nobody's business.
Couillard married a drug dealer who turned mole and then ended up dead, then another guy who also became a mole. What's to say she's not a mole herself? And considering the losers she's been repeatedly attracted to, don't you think this says something about Bernier himself?

The Star shouldn't consider it sufficient to say it's unclear how the two met; they should darn well find out exactly how they met and whether there were recreational drugs involved.

Other stuff:

Remember this: if you don't have a leg to stand on, your only defence is name calling:

CanadaCom: Harper condemns criticism of Israel as thinly-veiled anti-Semitism  "I guess my fear is what I see happening in some circles is (an) anti-Israeli sentiment, really just as a thinly disguised veil for good old-fashioned anti-Semitism, which I think is completely unacceptable," Mr. Harper said in an interview with CJAD/CFRB radio.

Unfortunately, the pejorative Harper chooses has been overused to the point of having lost all meaning - if it ever had any beyond the power of a taboo that creates reverse discrimination in that we can criticize China, for instance, but Israel is sacrosanct.
 
Harper's blind support of Israeli policies is based partly on religious indoctrination, partly on directives from the US, and perhaps more importantly, his hope of "the Jewish vote" (a prejudicial term if ever there was one, suggesting that all Jews think with the same noodles).

Is Harper anti-Asian when he criticizes China's human rights policies?  He would likely be quick to deny it - which shows he's not being logical at all.

Speaking of discrimination:
CP: Provs should consider law to restrict older drivers with health issues: conference

We should all be giving up our drivers licences for several reasons.
1) The fuels used are killing and starving people all over the world and driving up food prices everywhere due to the use of farm lands for alternative fuels instead of food.
2)  The scarcity and cost of fuels is going to increase, so you're going to have to take public transportation sooner or later.
3) The fumes from the exhaust of so many vehicles on city streets is causing all sorts of health problems.
4)  Your next licence will probably be microchipped. (And that's why I won't be renewing my drivers' licence)

Hey, have you ever seen the movie "The World's Fastest Indian" starring Anthony Hopkins?  If you want to know what "old" people are capable of when they're strong enough to resist all the negative "expert" myths about aging, see the film.  It's a true story about New Zealand's senior citizen Burt Munro whose ancient speed bike was held together by Burt's home remedies, but it broke a speed record anyway!

Addendum:
I read recently that males 16-24 cause 10% of car accidents and the elderly cause almost the same percentage.  That means that 80% of car accidents are caused by the group in between.  Another good reason for scrapping cars in favour of public transportation and the insurance companies finding something more constructive to do?
Every 13 minutes, there is a death caused by a motor vehicle accident (lawyersource)

yayacanada