Logo - White "Y" cut into red background

WWW http://yayacanada.com
Commentary Blogging from Ottawa, Canada
Exposing government and media half truths and baldfaced lies

READER COMMENTS
*Guestbook*
Have your say!
Read what others are saying.

Archives
HOME PAGE
Friday June 27, 2008

Secret police, secret army
"They're having their way with you" Aus Rotten lyrics
1) Security Certificate Cases - Air India all over again? ... 2) "Not an allegation of a conspiracy" ... 3) Other Stuff: Suicides related to phone masts, free speech upheld by Supreme Court, and the seduction of John Gomery

1) Security Certificate Cases - Air India all over again?

High court ruling nudges spy service out of the shadows: lawyers (CP)
At issue were interviews CSIS conducted with Montreal teacher and alleged al-Qaida agent Adil Charkaoui, including one in which he purportedly discussed strategies for recruiting others to the terrorist cause.

General written summaries were retained, in keeping with standard CSIS policy, but the original tapes and notes were destroyed - a longstanding practice the Supreme Court said stemmed from misinterpretation of the law governing the spy service.
So, we have to assume that the interview tapes have been destroyed in all of the security certificate cases, and we have only the word of CSIS that the detainees said anything at all.

CSIS policy unconstitutional (TorStar)
CSIS has always maintained that since the agency's mandate is to collect intelligence, not evidence, agents should keep their operational notes only in limited circumstances.
If that's the case, then why has CSIS been allowed to use its limited "intelligence" as evidence? Their "intelligence" has no evidence to support it. That makes it merely hearsay.

THIS MEANS THAT THE SECURITY CERTIFICATE DETAINEES SHOULD BE FREED IMMEDIATELY!

This is exactly how CSIS screwed up the Air India case.  But if you want to know who's in bed with CSIS, and why they've gotten away with their dirty dealings, and why our justice system is so badly screwed up, begin by reading this article (Canada Freep) that reveals who headed up CSIS at the time of the hearings - Reid Morden - and who even defended (Wikipedia) the destruction of evidence tapes (Wikipedia) in that case.

Reid Morden's bio is heavy on all sorts of - I'm going to say it even though I think it's too flattering a term for the New World Order enthusiasts - "Illuminati" awards
(including the dime-a-dozen Order of Canada), and is considered worthy of being an investigator into the UN oil for food scandal - a man who defends screw-ups that obstruct justice!

And then take a look at who headed up the CSIS oversight committee.  And think about where that man, Bob Rae, is now - next in line to the itchy second in line (his close American buddy Michael Ignatieff) to Canada's Liberal leader.
For five years, Rae was a member of the federal Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC), the body that oversees CSIS. Rae's SIRC post began on April 30, 1998. According to the Weekly Voice, Rae is an insider "who knows the intelligence community well".
Doesn't it seem that our "intelligence" community, our politicians (both Liberal and Conservative) and the international cabal moving us toward one-world-government are a bit too incestuously entwined to properly administer democracy?

Sohie Harkat says "they want to rush things this time" regarding upcoming court dates in the security certificate cases. Is it foolish to hope that this means the judge's ruling has weakened the already flimsy cases against the detainees and that CSIS will want to wangle somehow to let the matter drop, as happened with the Air India case, at least for a couple of decades until an inquiry was angrily demanded.

Sadly, it could also mean that since the Toronto "terrorist" cases are also crumbling, the "intelligence" community will be left free to cook up more half-baked schemes involving hardship for Muslims but serving to frighten a significant number of Canadians into renewing support for war and a burgeoning police state.

==================

2) "Not an allegation of a conspiracy"

As noted here there was a lot of concern for Sarkozy when an Israeli police officer fell dead from a gunshot wound.  Now, in spite of an official statement that it was a suicide, questions abound.
   
Was the incident that marred Sarkozy's exit a suicide or assassination try? (Israeli Insider)
(Thanks to Linda for the link)
This is not an allegation of a conspiracy, but a query about odd circumstances and unanswered questions. At this time, no one has offered concrete proof of foul play, and there is every reason to believe that no one every will. The "guarding partner" and the female soldiers will be kept far from the media.

There is every motive to do so for the powers that be: an assassination attempt during an official ceremony for a visiting head of state would be a security failure of catastrophic proportions. Thus there is a national security interest in covering up a possible assassination attempt, so that foreign leaders will not think twice before coming to visit security-conscious Israel, the reputed world leader in personal VIP protection.
Not a conspiracy, no, no.  Just a coordinated attempt to manipulate and hide the truth. Supposedly, there's a difference.

Now we learn the dead officer is a Druze.  Not a Jew, therefore expendable in the mind of a Zionist. If it was a botched assassination attempt, the hit man missed his cue, but the shooter who was supposed to simultaneously take out the patsy was right on schedule.  Good insurance measure - if the headshot didn't kill him, the fall would.

Strange that this should happen just as a poll was about to be released showing that in spite of the bad press of a police investigation into Olmert's financial dealings, he didn't get knocked out of the running for the Kadima leadership.

Olmert's continued leadership is, of course, considered vital to the ongoing peace negotiations. And fanatical settlers and their parliamentary representatives want him gone. So why are people assuming Sarkozy was the target - if indeed there was a target, and I think there may well have been.

3) Other Stuff:

Suicides linked to phone masts (Daily Express)
(Thanks to Barb who comments: "The radio waves he talks about are also emitted by compact fluorescents. Looks like we have a genuine genocide going on".)
Dr Roger Coghill, who sits on a Government advisory committee on mobile radiation, has discovered that all 22 youngsters who have killed themselves in Bridgend, South Wales, over the past 18 months lived far closer than average to a mast.
At the very least, the people making money off these new technologies don't give a dam what happens to the people who use them.

I am getting pretty sick of hearing “There is no evidence..." blah, blah, blah from so-called experts.  They say the same thing about vaccine damage. There is no evidence, folks, because no indepth testing took place, and because any possible contraindications that did appear in rudimentary investigations were buried.

Bridgend: 'This Is Not A Suicide Town' (Skye)

=====================

Supreme Court throws out libel case against outspoken B.C. talk show host (CP)  "We live in a free country where people have as much right to express outrageous and ridiculous opinions as moderate ones."

Bingo! In a democratic society all voices need to be heard.  How can we form any conclusions about anything without first hearing all sides of an issue?  B'nai brith, are you listening?

======================

Gomery "Seduced by the media" (TorStar)
A Federal Court ruling has blasted the biased musings of Judge John Gomery during the sponsorship inquiry and cleared former prime minister Jean Chrétien and his chief of staff, Jean Pelletier, of any blame in the affair.

So the media had their way with John Gomery.  That's the agenda driven media, allright. Love em and leave em - swingin' in the wind. But if you do it for money and fame, is it really a seduction?  I suspect the media weren't Gomery's only other Johns.

yayacanada